20180927

SCOTUS Nominee Personal Vote Tallies Recommendation of 65-1



Today was one for the record books. It became a case of Ford v. Kavanaugh, or vice versa in believability of who did, or did not do, what was alleged.

Gut-wrenching best describes each of the participants on center stage.

Ford’s testimony of one beer at 15yo, and becoming a victim of sexual assault, made many women of all ages, silently harboring such a secret, feel heard on some level.   

Who could defend a SCOTUS nominee after such a heartfelt testimony? 

Life teaches to show restraint, and not get emotional when others put their hearts on the table. And, I have to say that in today’s testimonies I had to be all ears and leave my emotions out of the mix.

All said, I believe Ford was victimized. However, her inability to know how she got home from the party leaves me with one huge question.

How could it be, that on the night she was violated, she can’t remember who to thank for getting her safely home?          

AND THEN, after a couple of hours, the accused gets his chance to defend his name.

Kavanaugh has an impeccable professional record, with the blemish of a man who in his teens decades removed, sometimes ‘drank too many beers’ in accordance with alcoholic guidelines.

This brings us to the now; which, is what matters the most. In the now, whether this judge’s record is one that will offer sound judgments on legal cases rendering constitutional decisions is what matters.

Is his now record a reflection of the man he is today? A decision has to be made on whether this nominee will get a vote.

If I was a member of the betting community, I believe the now man will win the nomination. I do believe that the unsupported allegations of what he did in his youth will never overshadow who he is now, today.

I’m reminded of the teen years, and the words of Jesus: “Let he who is without sin cast the first stone” (John 8:7). This in no way makes light of Ford's trauma.

I couldn’t help but note the title Hon. before his name. Honorable is what this means. A total blindside best describes his experience with these ‘out of the blue’ allegations.

On one hand, we have a highly convincing female citing an alleged incident with no ‘there’ witnesses, and her friends denying recall of any such occurrences.

On the other hand, we have 65 witnesses, all female, citing a stellar record of this SCOTUS nominee. Speaking of stellar, this describes his record as a husband, dad, and member of his community.

I have my opinion; but, I’m not paid to be the deciding vote. Between Ford’s inability to remember how she got home from her tragic violation, and Kavanaugh being defined as a person who drank too much, makes it difficult, if not impossible, to ever base a deciding vote on today's demonstration of yesteryear's she said, he said; did, didn’t do it, discussions.

Stay tuned.